The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act

The UIGEA is often referred to as the United State’s anti-online casino bill, but is actually an acronym for the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (of 2006). This piece of legislation was simply tacked on to a much larger bill that mainly dealt with security at the country’s ports. The legislation has a somewhat confusing history, and we will do our best toe extrapolate on it here.

UIGEA History

After several unsuccessful attempts to pass anti gambling legislation, in 2006, members of Congress came up with another idea, to sneak some anti gambling legislation into an existing bill that already had been passed by Congress.

The SAFE Port Act, a bill dealing with the protection of America’s ports, was passed by the House of Representatives on May 4, 2006, and by the Senate on September 14, 2006. It did not include any references to gambling at this point though.

Then, the anti gambling folks went to work, and the UIGEA provisions were added to the bill, and over the next few days it was resubmitted to both the House and the Senate, where the usual reading of the additions to the bill were waived.

It received approval in spite of hardly anyone knowing much about this new addition, and then the revised bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 13, 2006.

As testimony to this being rammed through without a proper review by legislators, the UIGEA provisions were taken directly from a previous bill that had failed to be passed by Congress, the Internet Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act. Instead of failing, the new SAFE Port Act with the UIGEA add on was passed by the House by a vote of 409-2 and received unanimous approval in the Senate.

So they had found a way to get something like this passed, after several years of trying without any success. While many feel that the UIGEA should at least be challenged, it remains on the books today, in full force.

What Does The UIGEA Do Exactly?

The goal of the U.S. federal government had up until this point been an effort based upon propaganda, and this strategy continued on with the UIGEA. It didn’t help that the public hasn’t had a very good understanding of gambling law, but federal authorities have always been more than happy to enhance and perpetuate this misinformation and misunderstanding.

So after the UIGEA was passed, many people thought online gambling was now illegal in the United States, by way of federal law, if it wasn’t already, and they were already telling us it was so it surely is illegal now. Seeing most offshore online gambling sites exit the U.S. market just fueled the fire with this perception.

Since the goal of the UIGEA was to drive these foreign operators out of the market, the legislation was a big success indeed, and a lot of this was driven by a lot of these offshore sites just not wanting to bother with the U.S. market anymore, they had had enough in other words.

The UIGEA does not in any way make online gambling illegal though, either on the part of players or on the part of operators. It actually really didn’t change anything from a practical perspective, but it sure blew a lot of smoke and some of this got in the eyes of some people.

So what does the UIGEA do anyway?  Well it makes it illegal for gambling operators to accept illegal gambling related financial transactions. However, given that the gambling in question is already illegal, whatever law that made it illegal in the first place could already be used.

For instance, if someone in the United States is found to be operating an illegal sports betting operation, they could be convicted under the Wire Act, the law that made it illegal, and merely accepting bets would be sufficient, as well as required, for a conviction, so the UIGEA would add nothing really, even though there would be financial transactions involved as well and they could be charged under the UIGEA as well, but this is not really meaningful.

The Effects of the UIGEA

So this law pertains only to those in the business of gambling, online gambling operators, not to players or financial institutions, as many people still believe. The gambling in question must already be illegal, in which case, once again, if they are to be charged and convicted, in all cases they could be charged and convicted with or without the UIGEA.

Of course, the scope of the law only applies to those under U.S. law, which rules out any and all foreign operators, they are not subject to the laws of the United States, but rather, the laws of the jurisdiction in which they are located. This is also not well understood by the public.

The idea behind the UIGEA was not really a legal one, it was to use this to bolster the propaganda effort that the U.S. government was waging upon both the public and offshore businesses involved in the online gambling trade.

The government already had tools to charge companies processing financial transactions related to illegal gambling, as it did with the two founders of Neteller, who were both charged with money laundering. In order to make these charges stick you have to prove, among other things, that the proceeds were actually from illegal activity, but the government doesn’t worry about these things because the threat of this is enough.

The amount of talk around about the UIGEA since has been phenomenal, and you would think from reading a lot of it that the UIGEA produced some groundbreaking changes, when in fact it added nothing really to the online gambling landscape, save for it serving to confuse a lot of people.

In spite of what a lot of people think, there really isn’t even a need to repeal this law, it’s a meaningless law really with no teeth at all of its own, and at best could be just added on to any genuinely prosecutable gambling charges that the government may wish to wield on online gambling operators.

These operators though generally aren’t really under their thumb though in any sense, and unless they are foolish enough to visit the U.S. while under indictment, like those two fellows from Neteller did, or are an American resident who is looking to run a domestic sports book, the UIGEA is nothing to bother about at all, and these people could be charged with or without the UIGEA in effect.

The UIGEA has served to scare and intimidate though, and quite a few offshore gambling sites washed their hands with the U.S. after this, and several major payment processors have also exited the market, and a lot of players have stopped playing.

Fortunately though, there are enough operators and businesses, as well as a huge number of players, who understand things well enough not to be unduly intimidated, and the online gambling industry in the United States continues to thrive.

UIGEA FAQs

Does the UIGEA mean I cannot gamble online?

No, there are hundreds of online casinos able to offer real money games to people from the United States. Despite UIGEA’s existence, it is still completely within the realm of the law if you gamble online at one of the many sites that still accept US deposits.

Will my bank account be frozen if I use it to deposit at an online casino?

No. The simple fact of the matter is that no one has ever had their bank account frozen because they decided to gamble online in the United States. You should have no concerns about the safety of your banking assets when you choose to gamble online.

Will UIGEA ever be repealed?

There have quite honestly not been too many efforts made to repeal this bill, and there are not many that seem to be coming in the near future. This will allow the US to still be considered a nation that is not friendly to fans of online casinos.

Does UIGEA still make intrastate gambling illegal?

No. States like New Jersey and Nevada, which have their own legal, regulated intrastate online casino networks, do not have to worry about facing prosecution under UIGEA. This is why so many states are pushing to legalize similar intrastate networks.

Also read: